UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Commission File Number: 000-54677

CV Sciences, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

2688 South Rainbow Boulevard, Suite B, Las Vegas, NV 89146

(Address number of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(866) 290-2157

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. As of August 12, 2016, the issuer had 52,038,924 shares of issued and outstanding common stock, par value $0.0001.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE. None

CV SCIENCES, INC.

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). You may read and copy any document we file with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, U.S.A. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room. Our SEC filings are also available to the public from the SEC’s internet site at http://www.sec.gov.

On our Internet website, http://www.cvsciences.com, we post the following recent filings as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC: our annual reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. On June 8, 2016, the Company changed its trading symbol from CANV to CVSI, and continues to be traded on the OTC: Bulletin Board.

When we use the terms “CV Sciences”, “Company”, “we”, “our” and “us” we mean CV Sciences, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries, taken as a whole, as well as any predecessor entities, unless the context otherwise indicates.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the other reports, statements, and information that the Company has previously filed with or furnished to, or that we may subsequently file with or furnish to, the SEC and public announcements that we have previously made or may subsequently make include, may include, or may incorporate by reference certain statements that may be deemed to be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended, and that are intended to enjoy the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided by that Act. To the extent that any statements made in this report contain information that is not historical, these statements are essentially forward-looking. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “expects”, “plans”, “may,”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “should”, “intends”, “estimates”, and other words of similar meaning. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that cannot be predicted or quantified and, consequently, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, marketability of our products; legal and regulatory risks associated with the share exchange; our ability to raise additional capital to finance our activities; the future trading of our common stock; our ability to operate as a public company; our ability to protect our proprietary information; general economic and business conditions; the volatility of our operating results and financial condition; our ability to attract or retain qualified senior management personnel and research and development staff; and other risks detailed from time to time in our filings with the SEC, or otherwise.

Information regarding market and industry statistics contained in this report is included based on information available to us that we believe is accurate. It is generally based on industry and other publications that are not produced for purposes of securities offerings or economic analysis. Forecasts and other forward-looking information obtained from these sources are subject to the same qualifications and the additional uncertainties accompanying any estimates of future market size, revenue and market acceptance of products and services. We do not undertake any obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements. As a result, investors should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

CV SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

CV SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

UNAUDITED

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

CV SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

For the six months ended June 30, 2016

UNAUDITED

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

CV SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

UNAUDITED

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

CV SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

UNAUDITED

CV Sciences, Inc. (the “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us”) was incorporated under the name Foreclosure Solutions, Inc. in the State of Texas on December 9, 2010. On July 25, 2013, the Company’s predecessor, CannaVest Corp., a Texas corporation (“CannaVest Texas”), merged with the Company, a wholly-owned Delaware subsidiary of CannaVest Texas, to effectuate a change in the Company’s state of incorporation from Texas to Delaware. On January 4, 2016, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation reflecting its corporate name change to “CV Sciences, Inc.”, effective on January 5, 2016. In addition, on January 4, 2016, the Company amended its Bylaws to reflect its corporate name change to “CV Sciences, Inc.” The Company previously operated under the corporate name of CannaVest Corp. The change in corporate name was undertaken in connection with the acquisition of CanX Inc., a Florida-based, specialty pharmaceutical corporation (“CanX Acquisition”) as more fully set forth in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on January 4, 2016. On June 8, 2016 the Company announced that the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) had approved a change in the trading symbol for the Company’s common stock to “CVSI.” The Company’s common stock formerly traded under the symbol “CANV.”

The Company operates two distinct business segments: a consumer product segment in manufacturing, marketing and selling plant-based Cannabidiol (“CBD”) products to a range of market sectors; and, a specialty pharmaceutical segment focused on developing and commercializing novel therapeutics utilizing synthetic CBD. The specialty pharmaceutical segment began development activities during the second quarter of 2016.

Basis of Presentation – The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CV Sciences, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries US Hemp Oil, LLC, CannaVest Laboratories, LLC, Plus CBD, LLC. and CANNAVEST Acquisition, LLC; and the accounts of a 70% interest in CannaVest Europe, GmbH (collectively, the “Company”). All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company commenced commercial operations on January 29, 2013. On May 2, 2016, the Company filed Articles of Dissolution for its wholly-owned subsidiaries US Hemp Oil, LLC and CannaVEST Laboratories, LLC, with the Secretary of State of Nevada, effective as of April 29, 2016. Neither US Hemp Oil, LLC nor CannaVEST Laboratories, LLC had any assets or liabilities.

The unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC. The information furnished herein reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals and adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to fairly present the operating results for the respective periods. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally present in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes for the year ended December 31, 2015, filed with the SEC on the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 14, 2016. The results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2016.

Change in Accounting Policy – During the first quarter of fiscal year 2016, the Company changed its accounting policy for shipping and handling costs from sales of Company products. Under the new accounting policy, these costs are included in cost of goods sold, whereas, they were previously included in selling, general and administrative expenses. Including these expenses in cost of goods sold better aligns these costs with the related revenue in the gross profit calculation. This accounting policy change has been applied retrospectively.

The Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 have been reclassified to reflect this change in accounting policy. The impact of this reclassification was an increase of $111,217 and $70,799 to cost of goods sold for the for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and a corresponding decrease to selling, general and administrative expenses in the same periods. The impact of this reclassification was an increase of $197,508 and $123,823 to cost of goods sold for the for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and a corresponding decrease to selling, general and administrative expenses in the same periods. This reclassification had no impact on Net Sales, Operating Loss, Net Loss or Net Loss per Share.

Liquidity – For the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company had a net loss of $2,226,902 and $2,003,068, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company had a net loss of $3,760,019 and $4,651,858, respectively. In addition, for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company had negative cash flows from operations of $905,660 and $3,826,247, respectively. Management believes the Company has the funds needed to continue its consumer product business segment and meet its other obligations over the next year solely from current revenues and cash flow due to increased sales and because our current inventory levels are sufficient to support sales through the second quarter of 2017, resulting in reduced cash outflow for inventory purchases. In addition, we do not intend to purchase raw inventory from our supply chain arrangements from the 2016 crop.

The Company’s pharmaceutical business segment will require additional capital of approximately $1,500,000 over the next 12 months. Management believes that it will be able to obtain such financing on terms acceptable to the Company, however, there can be no assurances that the Company will be successful. If the Company is unable to raise additional capital, the Company would likely be forced to curtail pharmaceutical development.

Business Combinations – We apply the provisions of the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”), in the accounting for our acquisitions. ASC 805 establishes principles and requirements for recognizing and measuring the total consideration transferred to and the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any non-controlling interests in the acquired target in an asset purchase. ASC 805 requires us to recognize separately from goodwill the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the acquisition date fair values. Goodwill as of the acquisition date is measured as the excess of consideration transferred over the net of the acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. While we use our best estimates and assumptions to accurately value assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date as well as contingent consideration, where applicable, our estimates are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. As a result, during the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date, we record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the values of assets acquired or liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to our consolidated statements of operations.

Accounting for business combinations requires our management to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially at the acquisition date, including our estimates for intangible assets, contractual obligations assumed, pre-acquisition contingencies and contingent consideration, where applicable. Although we believe the assumptions and estimates we have made in the past have been reasonable and appropriate, they are based in part on historical experience and information obtained from the management of the acquired companies and are inherently uncertain.

Examples of critical estimates in valuing certain of the intangible assets we have acquired include but are not limited to:

Goodwill and Intangible Assets – The Company evaluates the carrying value of goodwill and intangible assets annually during the fourth quarter in accordance with ASC 350 Intangibles – Goodwill and Other and between annual evaluations if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount. Such circumstances could include, but are not limited to (1) a significant adverse change in legal factors or in business climate, (2) unanticipated competition, or (3) an adverse action or assessment by a regulator. When evaluating whether goodwill is impaired, the Company compares the fair value of the reporting unit to which the goodwill is assigned to the reporting unit’s carrying amount, including goodwill. The fair value of the reporting unit is estimated using a combination of the income, or discounted cash flows, approach and the market approach, which utilizes comparable companies’ data. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, then the amount of the impairment loss must be measured. The impairment loss would be calculated by comparing the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill to its carrying amount. In calculating the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill, the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the other assets and liabilities of that unit based on their fair values. The excess of the fair value of a reporting unit over the amount assigned to its other assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill.

We make critical assumptions and estimates in completing impairment assessments of goodwill and other intangible assets. Our cash flow projections look several years into the future and include assumptions on variables such as future sales and operating margin growth rates, economic conditions, market competition, inflation and discount rates.

We classify intangible assets into three categories: (1) intangible assets with definite lives subject to amortization, (2) intangible assets with indefinite lives not subject to amortization, and (3) goodwill. We determine the useful lives of our identifiable intangible assets after considering the specific facts and circumstances related to each intangible asset. Factors we consider when determining useful lives include the contractual term of any agreement related to the asset, the historical performance of the asset, our long-term strategy for using the asset, any laws or regulations which could impact the useful life of the asset and other economic factors, including competition and specific market conditions. Intangible assets that are deemed to have definite lives are amortized, primarily on a straight-line basis, over their useful lives, generally five years. IPR&D has an indefinite life and is not amortized until completion and development of the project, at which time the IPR&D becomes an amortizable asset. If the related project is not completed in a timely manner or the project is terminated or abandoned, the Company may have an impairment related to the IPR&D, calculated as the excess of the asset’s carrying value over its fair value. The intangible assets with estimable useful lives are amortized on a straight line basis over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values. This method of amortization approximates the expected future cash flow generated from their use. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, there were no impairments.

Use of Estimates – The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make significant estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate our estimates, including those related to contingencies, on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Significant estimates include the valuation of intangible assets, the amortization lives of intangible assets, valuation of contingent consideration, inputs for valuing warrants, a note payable beneficial conversion feature and stock-based compensation, and the allowance for doubtful accounts. It is at least reasonably possible that a change in the estimates will occur in the near term.

Reportable Segment – With the recent CanX Acquisition, the Company has two business segments; consumer products and specialty pharmaceutical. Our consumer products segment develops, manufactures and markets products based on plant-based CBD, including under the name PlusCBD™ in a variety of market sectors including nutraceutical, beauty care, specialty foods and vape. Our specialty pharmaceutical segment is newly established to develop a variety of drug candidates which use synthetic CBD as a primary active ingredient. The specialty pharmaceutical segment began development activities during the second quarter of 2016.

Cash and Cash Equivalents – For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, the Company considers amounts held by financial institutions and short-term investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash and cash equivalents. At each of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had no cash equivalents.

Concentrations of Credit Risk – As of June 30, 2016, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) provided insurance coverage of up to $250,000 per depositor per bank. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and does not believe that the Company is exposed to significant risks from excess deposits. The Company’s cash balance in excess of FDIC limits totaled $1,114,848 at June 30, 2016.

At June 30, 2016, the Company had two notes receivable totaling $540,351, one of which is from sale of inventory to Medical Marijuana, Inc. (“MJNA”), and the second note is from a litigation settlement with MJNA (Note 3).

One customer represented 61% of our accounts receivable balance at June 30, 2016 and two customers represented 83% of our accounts receivable balance at December 31, 2015.

Accounts Receivable – Generally, the Company requires payment prior to shipment. However, in certain circumstances, the Company provides credit to companies located throughout the U.S. Accounts receivable consists of trade accounts arising in the normal course of business. Accounts receivable for large accounts are generally secured. Smaller accounts receivable, generally less than $10,000, are unsecured and no interest is charged on past due accounts. Accounts for which no payments have been received after 30 days are considered delinquent and customary collection efforts are initiated. Accounts receivable are carried at original invoice amount less a reserve made for doubtful receivables based on a review of all outstanding amounts on a quarterly basis.

Management has determined the allowance for doubtful accounts by regularly evaluating individual customer receivables and considering a customer’s financial condition and credit history, and current economic conditions. As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts related to accounts receivable in the amount of $100,000.

Revenue Recognition - The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition which requires persuasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery of a product or service, a fixed or determinable price and assurance of collection within a reasonable period of time. The Company records revenue when goods are delivered to customers and the rights of ownership have transferred from the Company to the customer.

Sales Tax – The Company is responsible for collecting tax on sales to end customers and remitting these taxes to applicable jurisdictions. These taxes are assessed based on the location of the end customer and the laws of the jurisdiction in which they reside.

Shipping and Handling – Shipping and handling costs totaled $111,217 and $70,799 for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Shipping and handling costs totaled $197,508 and $123,823 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Shipping and handling costs are recorded in cost of goods sold.

Returns – Finished Products – Within ten (10) days of a customer’s receipt of Company’s finished products, the customer may return (i) finished products that do not conform to Company’s product specifications or (ii), finished products which are defective, provided that notice of condition is given within five (5) days of receiving the finished products. The failure to comply with the foregoing time requirements shall be deemed a waiver of the customer’s claim for incorrect or defective shipments. In the event of the existence of one or more material defects in any finished product upon delivery to the customer, the Company shall, at its sole option and cost, either (a) take such measures as are required to cure the defect(s) designated in the notice, or (b) replace such defective finished product(s). The Company may, at its sole option, require the return or destruction of the defective finished products. The customer shall afford the Company the opportunity to verify that such defects existed prior to shipment and were not, for purposes of example and not limitation, the result of improper transport, handling, storage, product rotation or misuse by the customer.

Bulk Oil Products – Sales of bulk oil products are generally final, and beginning in 2015 the Company does not accept returns under any circumstances.

There is no allowance for customer returns at June 30, 2016 or December 31, 2015 due to insignificant return amounts experienced during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015, respectively.

Compensation and Benefits – The Company records compensation and benefits expense for all cash and deferred compensation, benefits, and related taxes as earned by its employees. Compensation and benefits expense also includes compensation earned by temporary employees and contractors who perform similar services to those performed by the Company’s employees, primarily information technology and project management activities.

Stock-Based Compensation – Certain employees, officers, directors and consultants of the Company participate in various long-term incentive plans that provide for granting stock options and restricted stock awards. Stock options generally vest in equal increments over a two- to four-year period and expire on the tenth anniversary following the date of grant. Restricted stock awards generally vest 100% at the grant date.

The Company recognizes stock-based compensation for equity awards granted to employees, officers, and directors as compensation and benefits expense on the condensed consolidated statements of operation. The fair value of stock options is estimated using a Black-Scholes valuation model on the date of grant. The fair value of restricted stock awards is equal to the closing price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant. Stock-based compensation is recognized over the requisite service period of the individual awards, which generally equals the vesting period.

The Company recognizes stock-based compensation for equity awards granted to consultants as selling, general and administrative expense on the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of stock options is estimated using a Black-Scholes valuation model on the date of grant and unvested awards are revalued at each reporting period. The fair value of restricted stock awards is equal to the closing price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant multiplied by the number of shares awarded. Stock-based compensation is recognized over the requisite service period of the individual awards, which generally equals the vesting period.

Inventory – Inventory is stated at lower of cost or market, with cost being determined on average cost basis. There was no reserve for obsolete inventory as of June 30, 2016 or December 31, 2015. As of June 30, 2016, the Company had $7,587,136 of inventory in Germany and the Netherlands.

Property & Equipment – Equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Cost represents the purchase price of the asset and other costs incurred to bring the asset into its existing use. Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis over the assets’ estimated useful lives. Tenant improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the related lease. Maintenance or repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Upon sale or disposition, the historically-recorded asset cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the net amount less proceeds from disposal is charged or credited to other income (expense).

Property and equipment, net, as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were as follows:

Depreciation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was $48,690 and $49,318, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was $97,715 and $93,543, respectively.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments – In accordance with ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments, the Company calculates the fair value of its assets and liabilities which qualify as financial instruments and includes this additional information in the notes to its financial statements when the fair value is different than the carrying value of those financial instruments. The estimated fair value of the Company’s current assets and current liabilities approximates their carrying amount due to their readily available nature and short maturity.

Long-Lived Assets – In accordance with ASC Topic 360, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the Company reviews property and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of property and equipment is measured by comparing its carrying value to the undiscounted projected future cash flows that the asset(s) are expected to generate. If the carrying amount of an asset is not recoverable, we recognize an impairment loss based on the excess of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset over its respective fair value, which is generally determined as the present value of estimated future cash flows or at the appraised value. The impairment analysis is based on significant assumptions of future results made by management, including revenue and cash flow projections. Circumstances that may lead to impairment of property and equipment include a significant decrease in the market price of a long-lived asset, a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which a long-lived asset is being used or in its physical condition and a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of a long-lived asset including an adverse action or assessment by a regulator.

Debt Issuance Costs – Debt issuance costs have been recorded as a discount to secured convertible and non-convertible promissory notes payable and are being amortized to interest expense using the interest method over the expected terms of the related debt agreements.

Loss per Share – The Company calculates earning or loss per share (“EPS”) in accordance with ASC Topic 260, Earnings per Share, which requires the computation and disclosure of two EPS amounts, basic and diluted. Basic EPS is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding plus all potentially dilutive shares of common stock outstanding during the period. The Company had 10,919,985 and 6,749,444 of stock options outstanding that are anti-dilutive at June 30, 2016 and June 30, 2015, respectively. As of June 30, 2016, there were also warrants outstanding to purchase up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock. The Company may also be required to issue up to 19,500,000 shares of common stock related to contingent consideration from the CanX Acquisition and a variable amount of shares of common stock related to the potential conversion feature of the Iliad Note (as defined below) (Note 8).

Research and Development Expense – Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred and include, but are not limited to, employee salaries and benefits, cost of inventory used in product development, consulting service fees, the cost of renting and maintaining our laboratory facility and depreciation of laboratory equipment. Research and development expense for the consumer products segment was $224,266 and $366,079 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively. Research and development expense for the specialty pharmaceutical segment was $117,281 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016.

Income Taxes – Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which the related temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized when the rate change is enacted. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that will more likely than not be realized. In accordance with ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes, the Company recognizes the effect of uncertain income tax positions only if the positions are more likely than not of being sustained in an audit, based on the technical merits of the position. Recognized uncertain income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which those changes in judgment occur. The Company recognizes both interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as part of the income tax provision. As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company did not have a liability for unrecognized tax uncertainties. The Company is subject to routine audits by taxing jurisdictions. Management believes the Company is no longer subject to tax examinations for the years prior to 2011.

Recent Issued and Newly Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”), as amended by ASU 2015-14, which completes the joint effort by the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board to improve financial reporting by creating common revenue recognition guidance for GAAP and the International Financial Reporting Standards. ASU 2014-09 will become effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2018 and early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of ASU 2014-09 on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued guidance requiring management to evaluate on a regular basis whether any conditions or events have arisen that could raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The guidance (1) provides a definition for the term “substantial doubt,” (2) requires an evaluation every reporting period, interim periods included, (3) provides principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans to alleviate the substantial doubt, (4) requires certain disclosures if the substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of management’s plans, (5) requires an express statement, as well as other disclosures, if the substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) requires an assessment period of one year from the date the financial statements are issued. The standard is effective for the Company’s reporting year beginning January 1, 2017 and early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the potential impact of this guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Inventory: Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (“ASU 2015-11”), which requires inventory measured using any method other than last-in, first out or the retail inventory method to be subsequently measured at the lower of cost or net realizable value, rather than at the lower of cost or market. ASU 2015-11 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and for interim periods within such annual periods. Early application is permitted. The Company is evaluating the potential impact of this guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, Business Combinations (“ASU 2015-16”), which simplifies the accounting for measurement-period adjustments by eliminating the requirement to restate prior period financial statements for measurement period adjustments. The new guidance requires the cumulative impact of measurement period adjustments, including the impact on prior periods, to be recognized in the reporting period in which the adjustment is identified. ASU 2015-16 is effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for any interim and annual financial statements that have not yet been issued. The Company implemented this standard during the first quarter of 2016.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (“ASU 2016-02”), which, for operating leases, requires a lessee to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability, initially measured at the present value of the lease payments, in its balance sheet. The standard also requires a lessee to recognize a single lease cost, calculated so that the cost of the lease is allocated over the lease term, on a generally straight-line basis. ASU 2016-02 is effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the potential impact of this guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (“ASU 2015-09”), which involve multiple aspects of the accounting for share-based transactions, including income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the potential impact of this guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the SEC did not, or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future financial statements. 

Notes receivable at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was comprised of the following:

The MJNA settlement note relates to an agreement as reported in the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 20, 2015 (the “July Form 8-K”). As further discussed in the July Form 8-K, on July 14, 2015, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with MJNA, HempMeds PX, LLC, Kannaway, LLC, General Hemp, LLC, HDDC Holdings, LLC, Rabbit Hole Technologies, Inc., Hemp Deposit and Distribution Corporation and MJNA Holdings, LLC (collectively, the “MJNA Parties”) to settle multiple litigation matters between the Company and the MJNA Parties (the “Settlement Agreement”).

Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the MJNA Parties paid the Company the sum of $150,000 and delivered a promissory note in the principal amount of $600,000 (“Settlement Note”), bearing interest at the rate of 6% per annum, payable in six equal monthly installments of $101,757 commencing August 15, 2015. The promissory note was secured by shares of the Company’s common stock held by the MJNA Parties. In November 2015, MJNA failed to timely pay the fourth payment installment under the Settlement Note and therefore defaulted on the Settlement Note. On December 3, 2015, the Company foreclosed on the Settlement Note collateral consisting of Company common stock. The foreclosure resulted in the Company obtaining rights to receive 624,750 shares of its common stock in full satisfaction of the remaining principal and accrued interest balance. At the foreclosure date, the Company took immediate possession of 500,000 shares held in escrow. At June 30, 2016, the Company was arranging to obtain the remaining 124,750 shares as collateral under the Settlement Note. The Settlement Note balance of $60,351 at each of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 represents the fair value at the foreclosure date of the remaining 124,750 shares.

In August 2015, we entered into an agreement to sell MJNA our products and received from MJNA a promissory note in the principal amount of $2,002,910 (“MJNA Promissory Note”) that was to be paid in 12 equal installments beginning on November 3, 2015 in exchange for the product shipped to MJNA. The MJNA Promissory Note is secured by 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock held in escrow. MJNA has failed to make any payments on the MJNA Promissory Note and is in default. The MJNA Promissory Note is likely not collectible, and the probable form of collection is for the Company to foreclose on the 2,000,000 shares of Company common stock. At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the fair value of the collateral was determined to be $480,000 equal to the $0.24 per share closing price of the Company’s Common Stock as of December 31, 2015, respectively, multiplied by the 2,000,000 shares of Company common stock.

The MediJane Holdings, Inc. (“MJMD”) note relates to the sale of Company products during December 2014 in exchange for a convertible promissory note in the amount of $1,200,000 (“MJMD Note”). The full amount of the MJMD Note was due on June 23, 2015 along with accrued interest at 10%. MJMD was unable to secure financing in support of its operations and was not able to sell or otherwise commercialize the Company products purchased. In February 2016, the Company entered into an amendment to the MJMD Note, providing for the return of Company products previously sold to MJMD. A portion of the Company products previously sold to MJMD were returned to the Company in February 2016 with the remaining products returned in June 2016. At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the fair value of the remaining Company products to be returned was determined to be $0 and $77,330, respectively, equal to the cost value of the Company products to be returned, reduced by $9,218, which was recorded as a bad debt expense.

Inventory at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was comprised of the following:

Accrued expenses at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were as follows:

Intangible assets consisted of the following at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

Amortization expense for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 totaled $214,350 and $205,500, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 totaled $428,700 and $411,000, respectively.

Total receivables from MJNA totaled $540,351 at both June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

During the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company paid $100,000 and $1,434,050, respectively, to a stockholder of the Company who is a supplier of hemp oil and hemp to the Company. During the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company paid the same stockholder of the Company $102,977 and $2,976,436, respectively. In addition, during the second quarter of 2016, the Company issued 500,000 shares of common stock in connection with consulting services from a European supplier valued based on the closing trading price of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance.

Secured Convertible Promissory Notes Payable

On May 19, 2015 (the “Closing Date”), the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) with Redwood Management, LLC (the “Investor” or “Redwood”) pursuant to which the Investor committed to lend to the Company up to $6,500,000 (the “Financing”).

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company issued four tranches of convertible promissory notes (“Notes”) in the aggregate principal amount of $1,785,000 to the Investor and other third parties who were assigned rights by the Investor to participate in the Financing (together with the Investor, the “Investors”). During the first quarter of 2016, the Company repaid all remaining obligations under the SPA and has no intention of seeking further capital from the Investor, or any other investor(s) in the Financing.

The Company’s borrowings and conversions under the SPA for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and for the year ended December 31, 2015 is summarized in the table below:

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company repaid the remaining principal and interest balance under the Notes as follows: (i) issued 3,062,535 shares of its common stock to the Investors in connection with conversion of the remaining $255,000 principal balance of Promissory Note 2; (ii) repaid $357,000 of the aggregate principal amount of Promissory Note 3 plus interest in the amount of $148,944 in cash to the Investors, and issued 2,500,000 shares of its common stock to the Investors in connection with the conversion of the remaining principal amount of $153,000 of Promissory Note 3; and, (iii) repaid the entire principal amount of Promissory Note 4 in the amount of $255,000 plus interest in the amount of $93,075 in cash to the Investors.

On May 25, 2016 (the “Purchase Price Date”), the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (“Iliad SPA”) with Iliad Research and Trading, L.P. (the “Lender” or “Iliad”) pursuant to which the Lender loaned the Company $2,000,000. On the Purchase Price Date, the Company issued to Lender a Secured Convertible Promissory Note (the “Iliad Note”) in the principal amount of $2,055,000 in exchange for payment by Lender of $2,000,000. The principal sum of the Iliad Note reflects the amount invested, plus a 2.25% “Original Issue Discount” (“OID”) and a $10,000 reimbursement of Lender’s legal fees. Out of the proceeds from the Iliad Note, the Company paid the sum of $25,000 to its placement agent, Myers & Associates, L.P. The Company received net proceeds of $1,975,000 in exchange for the Iliad Note. The Iliad Note requires the repayment of all principal and any interest, fees, charges and late fees on the date that is thirteen months after the Purchase Price Date (the “Maturity Date”). Interest is to be paid on the outstanding balance at a rate of ten percent (10%) per annum from the Purchase Price Date until the Iliad Note is paid in full. Interest is accrued during the term of the Iliad Note and all interest calculations shall be computed on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve (12) thirty (30)-day months and shall compound daily. Subject to adjustment as set forth in the Iliad Note, the conversion price for each Lender conversion shall be $0.50 (the “Lender Conversion Price”), convertible into shares of fully paid and non-assessable common stock. Beginning on the date that is six months after the Purchase Price Date and continuing until the Maturity Date, Iliad shall have the right to redeem a portion of the Iliad Note in any amount up to the Maximum Monthly Redemption Amount ($275,000, which is the maximum aggregate redemption amount that may be redeemed in any calendar month), for which payments may be made in cash or by converting the redemption amount into shares of Company common stock at a conversion price which is the lesser of (a) the Lender Conversion Price of $0.50 and (b) the Market Price, defined as 70% (“the Conversion Factor”), subject to adjustment as follows: if at any time (1) the average of the three lowest closing bid prices in the previous twenty (20) trading days is below $0.25 per share then the Conversion Factor will be reduced by 10%, (2) the Company is not Deposit/Withdrawal At Custodian eligible, then the Conversion Factor will be reduced by an additional 5%, or (3) there has occurred a “Major Default” then the Conversion Factor will be reduced by an additional 5%. The Company may prepay the Iliad Note at any time by payment to Lender of 125% of the principal, interest and other amounts then due under the Note. The Company may prepay the Iliad Note notwithstanding an earlier notice of conversion from the Lender, provided that in such event the Lender may convert an amount not to exceed $300,000 under the Iliad Note. In connection with the Iliad Note, as set forth above, the Company incurred an original issue discount of $45,000 and $35,000 of other debt issuance costs, which will be amortized over the Iliad Note term. The Iliad Note is securitized by the Company’s accounts receivable, inventory and equipment.

The Company’s borrowing under the Iliad Note for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and for the year ended December 31, 2015 is summarized in the table below:

Due to the variability in potential convertible common shares, the Company recorded a beneficial conversion feature of approximately $370,000 at the time of the transaction, which will be amortized over six months. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company recorded interest expense of $77,581 for amortization of the beneficial conversion feature. The assumptions used by the Company for calculating the fair value of the beneficial conversion feature using the Binomial Lattice valuation model were: (i) Volatility of 74.0%; (ii) Risk-Free Interest Rate of 0.44%; and (iii) Expected Term of five months.

Unsecured Note Payable

On January 29, 2016, the Company issued an unsecured promissory note to a lender in the principal amount of $850,000 (“Promissory Note”) in consideration of a loan provided to the Company by the lender. The Promissory Note bears interest at 12% per annum, and the Company is obligated to make monthly interest-only payments in the amount of $8,500, for which the interest-only payments obligation commenced on March 1, 2016. All principal and accrued and unpaid interest is due under the Promissory Note on February 1, 2018. The Company has the right to prepay the Promissory Note without penalty or premium, provided that if a prepayment of principal is made before July 1, 2016, the investor is entitled to a prepayment interest guarantee equal to six months’ interest payments on the Promissory Note. In connection with the Promissory Note, the Company incurred an original issue discount of $30,000 and $18,570 of other debt issuance costs, which will be amortized over the Promissory Note term.

The Company’s borrowing under the Promissory Note for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and for the year ended December 31, 2015 is summarized below:

Pursuant to the terms of the Promissory Note, the Company issued to the lender a common stock purchase warrant providing the lender with the right to purchase up to 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Warrant”). The Warrant is exercisable, subject to certain limitations, subsequent to July 1, 2017 and before the date that is five years from the date of issuance at an exercise price of $0.20 per share, subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events such as stock splits and dividends. The Company recorded the fair value of the Warrant of $266,800 as a debt discount associated with the Promissory Note. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company recorded interest expense of $33,350 and $55,583, respectively, for amortization of the Warrant fair value. The assumptions used by the Company for calculating the fair value of the Warrant using the Black-Scholes valuation model were: (i) Volatility of 83.3%; (ii) Risk-Free Interest Rate of 2.12%; and (iii) Expected Term of five years.

Common Stock

The Company is authorized to issue up to 190,000,000 shares of common stock (par value $0.0001). As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had 52,038,924 and 45,451,389 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company issued 5,562,535 shares of common stock in connection with conversion of convertible debt and also issued 500,000 shares of common stock in connection with investment banking services. In addition, the Company issued 500,000 shares of common stock in connection with consulting services from a European supplier and issued 25,000 shares of common stock to a former member of the Company’s Board of Directors. The common stock issued in connection with professional services during the six months ended June 30, 2016 were valued based on the closing trading price of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance.

Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of $0.0001 par value preferred stock with designations, rights and preferences to be determined from time to time by the Board of Directors of the Company. Each such series or class shall have voting powers, if any, and such preferences and/or other special rights, with such qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights as shall be stated in the resolution or resolutions providing for the issuance of such series or class of shares of preferred stock. As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 there was no preferred stock issued and outstanding.

Options/Warrants

On July 23, 2014, Company stockholders approved the CV Sciences, Inc. Amended and Restated 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (“Amended 2013 Plan”), which provides for the granting of stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, stock bonus awards and performance-based awards. There are 15,000,000 shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the Amended 2013 Plan. This plan serves as the successor to the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan prior to it being amended and restated. There were no option awards under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan prior to it being amended and restated.

In January 2016, the Company issued a common stock purchase warrant with the right to purchase up to 2,000,000 shares of the Company common stock (Note 8).

The Company’s Amended 2013 Plan provides for the granting of stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, stock bonus awards and performance-based awards. As of June 30, 2016, the Company had 4,080,015 of authorized unissued shares reserved and available for issuance upon exercise and conversion of outstanding awards.

The stock options are exercisable at no less than the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant, and restricted stock and restricted stock units are issued at a value not less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant. Generally, stock options awarded are vested in equal increments ranging from two to four years on the annual anniversary date on which such equity grants were awarded. The stock options generally have a maximum term of 10 years. The following table summarizes stock option activity for the Amended 2013 Plan during the six months ended June 30, 2016:

The following table summarizes unvested stock options as of June 30, 2016:

The Company recognized expenses of $412,557 and $557,792 relating to stock options issued to employees, consultants, officers, and directors during the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company recognized expenses of $817,708 and $1,723,786 relating to stock options issued to employees, consultants, officers, and directors during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company recognized expenses of $258,125 and $308,900 relating to common stock issued to employees, consultants, officers, and directors during the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company recognized expenses of $433,125 and $898,900 relating to common stock issued to employees, consultants, officers, and directors during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, stock-based compensation of $670,682 and $857,846, was expensed to selling, general and administration, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, stock-based compensation of $1,250,833 and $2,601,173, was expensed to selling, general and administration, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, stock-based compensation of $0 and $8,846, was expensed to research and development, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, stock-based compensation of $0 and $21,513, was expensed to research and development, respectively. As of June 30, 2016, total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock-based compensation arrangements granted to employees, officers, and directors was $2,672,101, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.96 years.

Commitments

The Company has non-cancelable operating leases, which expire through 2017. The leases generally contain renewal options ranging from 1 to 3 years and require the Company to pay costs such as real estate taxes and common area maintenance. The following table provides the Company’s lease commitments at June 30, 2016:

The Company incurred rent expense of $88,507 and $96,613 for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and incurred rent expense of $227,889 and $171,105 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The Company has two supply arrangements in place with European farmers to supply raw material in future years. The first arrangement contemplates growth and processing of 2,600 kilograms of product and the second contract provides up to 1 million kilograms of raw product to the Company. At June 30, 2016, there was approximately $150,000 remaining to be paid under this second contract related to the 2015 crop. We have contractual rights for the growth and processing of hemp oil for delivery through October 2018 under both of these contracts. We anticipate the cost under both contracts will remain consistent with current year prices.

Contingencies

On April 23, 2014, Tanya Sallustro filed a purported class action complaint (the “Complaint”) in the Southern District of New York (the “Court”) alleging securities fraud and related claims against the Company and certain of its officers and directors and seeking compensatory damages including litigation costs. Ms. Sallustro alleges that between March 18-31, 2014, she purchased 325 shares of the Company’s common stock for a total investment of $15,791. The Complaint refers to Current Reports on Form 8-K and Current Reports on Form 8-K/A filings made by the Company on April 3, 2014 and April 14, 2014, in which the Company amended previously disclosed sales (sales originally stated at $1,275,000 were restated to $1,082,375 - reduction of $192,625) and restated goodwill as $1,855,512 (previously reported at net zero). Additionally, the Complaint states after the filing of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on April 3, 2014 and the following press release, the Company’s stock price “fell $7.30 per share, or more than 20%, to close at $25.30 per share.” Subsequent to the filing of the Complaint, six different individuals filed a motion asking to be designated the lead plaintiff in the litigation.  On March 19, 2015, the Court issued a ruling appointing Steve Schuck as lead plaintiff.  Counsel for Mr. Schuck filed a “consolidated amended complaint” on September 14, 2015. On December 11, 2015, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint.  After requesting several extensions, counsel for Mr. Schuck filed an opposition to the motion to dismiss on March 21, 2016.  The Company’s reply brief was filed on April 25, 2016.  No hearing date has been set by the Court at this time.  Management intends to vigorously defend the allegations and an estimate of possible loss cannot be made at this time.

On March 17, 2015, stockholder Michael Ruth filed a shareholder derivative suit in Nevada District Court alleging two causes of action: 1) Breach of Fiduciary Duty, and 2) “Gross Mismanagement.” The claims are premised on the same event as the already-pending securities class action case in New York discussed above – it is alleged that the Form 8-K filings misstated goodwill and sales of the Company, which when corrected, lead to a significant drop in stock price. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the suit on June 29, 2015.  Instead of opposing the Company’s motion, Mr. Ruth filed an amended complaint on July 20, 2015.  Thereafter, Mr. Ruth and the Company agreed to stay the action pending the outcome of the securities class action case in New York discussed above.  Management intends to vigorously defend the allegations.  Since no discovery has been conducted and the case remains stayed, an estimate of the possible loss or recovery cannot be made at this time.

Royalties

In addition to the contingent consideration in connection with the CanX Acquisition (Note 1), the Company is obligated to pay a 5% royalty of net sales on each of the first and second CBD drug products respectively, subject to, and commencing with the first commercial release by the Company of each of the first and second CBD drug products by the Company formulated to treat human medical conditions.

The Company operates in two distinct business segments: a consumer product segment in manufacturing, marketing and selling plant-based CBD products to a range of market sectors; and, a specialty pharmaceutical segment focused on developing and commercializing novel therapeutics utilizing synthetic CBD. The Company’s segments maintain separate financial information for which operating results are evaluated on a regular basis by the Company’s senior management in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company evaluates its consumer product segment based on net product sales, gross profit and operating income or loss. The Company currently evaluates its specialty pharmaceutical segment based on the progress of its clinical development programs.

The following table presents information by reportable operating segment for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015:

In July 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the grant of 250,000 option shares of the Company’s common stock to each of the non-management members of the Board of Directors; and, also approved a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to a former member of the Board of Directors.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations for the interim period ended June 30, 2016, should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes to those statements that are included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Our discussion includes forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, such as our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors. We use words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,” “project,” “continuing,” “ongoing,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements.

OVERVIEW

We are a life science company with two distinct business segments. Our specialty pharmaceutical business segment is focused on developing and commercializing novel therapeutics utilizing synthetic Cannabidiol (“CBD”). Our consumer product business segment is focused on manufacturing, marketing and selling plant-based CBD products to a range of market sectors.

Our pharmaceutical business segment is a development stage, specialty pharmaceutical company developing synthetic cannabinoids to treat a range of medical conditions. The Company’s product candidates are based on proprietary formulations, processes and technology that we believe are patent-protectable, and we plan to vigorously pursue patent protection on the Company’s two drug candidates.

Our consumer product business segment manufactures, markets and sells consumer products containing plant-based CBD under our PlusCBD™ brand in a range of market sectors including nutraceutical, beauty care, specialty foods and vape.

We expect to realize revenue from our consumer products business segment to fund a portion of our working capital needs. However, in order to fund our pharmaceutical product development efforts, we will need to raise additional capital through either the issuance of equity and/or debt. Given the small size of our company and the development stage of our pharmaceutical business segment, we may find it difficult to raise sufficient capital to meet our needs. We do not have any firm commitments for all of our capital needs, and there are no assurances it will be available to us. If we are unable to access capital as necessary, our ability to generate revenues and to continue as a going concern will be in jeopardy.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We currently focus on Adjusted EBITDA to evaluate our business relationships and our resulting operating performance and financial position. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA (net income plus interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization), further adjusted to exclude certain non-cash expenses and other adjustments as set forth below. We present Adjusted EBITDA because we consider it an important measure of our performance and it is a meaningful financial metric in assessing our operating performance from period to period by excluding certain items that we believe are not representative of our core business, such as certain non-cash items and other adjustments.

We believe that Adjusted EBITDA, viewed in addition to, and not in lieu of our reported results in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”), provides useful information to investors regarding our performance for the following reasons:

We used Adjusted EBITDA:

Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure and does not purport to be an alternative to net income as a measure of operating performance or to cash flows from operating activities as a measure of liquidity. The term Adjusted EBITDA is not defined under GAAP, and Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of net income (loss), operating income or any other performance measure derived in accordance with GAAP.

Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:

Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as a measure of discretionary cash available to us for investment in our business. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on GAAP results and using Adjusted EBITDA as supplemental information.

A reconciliation from our net loss to Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP measure, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 and is detailed below:

___________________

Critical Accounting Policies

We have disclosed in the notes to our consolidated financial statements and in “Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K, those accounting policies that we consider to be significant in determining our results of operation and financial condition. There have been no material changes to those policies that we consider to be significant since the filing of our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The accounting principles used in preparing our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements conform in all material respects to GAAP.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2016, the Company changed its accounting policy for shipping and handling costs from sales of Company products. Under the new accounting policy, these costs are included in cost of goods sold, whereas, they were previously included in selling, general and administrative expenses. Including these expenses in cost of goods sold better aligns these costs with the related revenue in the gross profit calculation. This accounting policy change has been applied retrospectively and had no impact on Net Sales, Operating Loss, Net Loss or Net Loss per Share.

On June 8, 2016 the Company changed its trading symbol from CANV to CVSI, and continues to be traded on the OTC: Bulletin Board.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2 in the accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Results of Operations

Three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015

Revenues and gross profit - We had sales of $2,487,756 and gross profit of $1,664,327, representing a gross profit percentage of 66.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2016 compared with sales of $2,413,886 and gross profit of $1,288,061, representing a gross profit percentage of 53.4% for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The sales increase for the three months ended June 30, 2016 is primarily due to lower bulk oil and product pricing and a change in sales mix in 2016 compared with 2015. Our current sales mix is more heavily weighted to branded finished products as compared to our historical focus on bulk oil sales. The combination of lower prices in 2016 compared to 2015, plus the transition from the Company’s historical reliance on bulk oil sales to a business model more focused on manufacturing and distribution of consumer products, contributed to a sales increase in the second quarter of 2016 compared to 2015. The gross margin increase in 2016 compared with 2015 is due to the change in sales mix and greater harvest and processing yields, which resulted in lower production costs for bulk oil and finished products.

For the six months ended June 30, 2016, we had sales of $4,910,434 and gross profit of $3,289,962, representing a gross profit percentage of 67.0% compared with sales of $5,127,938 and gross profit of $2,866,007, representing a gross profit of 55.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The same factors impacting the second quarter of 2016 discussed above - lower prices and the change in strategy from reliance on bulk oil sales to a consumer products business model - contributed to the relatively consistent sales for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to 2015. Similarly, the gross margin increase for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared with the same period in 2015, is due to the change in sales mix and greater harvest and processing yields, which resulted in lower production costs for bulk oil and finished products.

Selling, general and administrative expenses - For the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company incurred selling, general and administrative (the “SG&A”) expenses in the amount of $3,385,726 and $2,850,053, respectively. SG&A expense for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 includes $670,682 and $857,846, respectively, of stock-based compensation, a non-cash expense. The SG&A expenses include $48,690 and $49,318 of depreciation expense, and, $214,350 and $205,500 of amortization expense of intangible assets, for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. After adjusting for non-cash stock-based compensation, depreciation and amortization of intangible assets for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, SG&A costs increased by $714,615 in the second quarter of 2016 compared to the second quarter of 2015. This increase resulted from $122,809 of expense related to our specialty pharmaceutical segment, which began operations in the second quarter of 2016, and increased headcount, legal, commissions, marketing and employee benefits expenses.

For the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company incurred SG&A expenses in the amount of $6,074,970 compared with $6,787,204 for the six months ended June 30, 2015. SG&A expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 includes $1,250,833 and $2,601,173, respectively, of stock-based compensation, a non-cash expense. SG&A expenses also includes $97,715 and $93,543 of depreciation expense, and, $428,700 and $411,000 of amortization expense of intangible assets, for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. After adjusting for non-cash stock-based compensation, depreciation and amortization of intangible assets, SG&A costs increased by $616,234 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared with the same period in 2015. The increase resulted from $122,809 of expense related to our specialty pharmaceutical segment, which began operations in the second quarter of 2016, and increased headcount, legal, marketing, commissions, rent and employee benefits expenses.

Research and development expenses - For the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company incurred research and development (“R&D”) expenses of $341,547 and $433,544, respectively. These expenses are related to the cost of process development, rental of our laboratory facility, payroll expenses, laboratory supplies, product development and testing, outsourced research personnel and R&D expenses related to our specialty pharmaceutical segment for the period. During the second quarter of 2016, we incurred $117,281 of R&D expenses related to our specialty pharmaceutical segment. We also incurred $0 and $8,846 of stock-based compensation during the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. After adjusting for the specialty pharmaceutical R&D expense and the non-cash stock-based compensation, R&D costs related to our consumer products segment decreased by $200,432. This decrease resulted primarily from the Company transitioning R&D activities in its consumer product segment into production of consumer products.

For the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company incurred R&D expenses of $483,360 compared with $744,022 for the six months ended June 30, 2015. These expenses are related to the cost of process development, rental of our laboratory facility, payroll expenses, laboratory supplies, product development and testing, outsourced research personnel and R&D expenses related to our specialty pharmaceutical segment for the period. R&D expenses includes $117,281 related to our specialty pharmaceutical segment for the six months ended June 30, 2016. We also incurred $0 and $21,513 of stock-based compensation for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. After adjusting for the specialty pharmaceutical R&D expenses and the non-cash stock-based compensation expense, R&D costs related to our consumer products segment decreased by $356,430. This decrease resulted primarily from the Company transitioning R&D activities in its consumer product segment into production of inventory consumer products.

Interest income/expense – Interest income was $5 and $33,446 for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Interest expense was $163,961 and $16,124 for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2015 relates primarily to interest on the Company’s notes payable. The increase in interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2016 compared with the same period in 2015 was due to increased borrowings and the amortizations of debt discounts and the beneficial conversion feature.

Interest income was $27,658 and $70,488 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Interest expense was $519,309 and $16,124 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Interest expense of $519,309 during the six months ended June 30, 2016 consists primarily of interest on the Company’s notes payable. The increase in interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared with the same period in 2015 was due to increased borrowings and the amortizations of debt discounts and the beneficial conversion feature.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

A summary of our changes in cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 is provided below:

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by or used in operating activities includes net loss adjusted for non-cash expenses such as depreciation and amortization, and stock-based compensation. Operating assets and liabilities primarily include balances related to funding of inventory purchases and customer accounts receivable. Operating assets and liabilities that arise from the funding of inventory purchases and customer accounts receivable can fluctuate significantly from day to day and period to period depending on the timing of inventory purchases and customer behavior.

Net cash used in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 totaled $905,660 and $3,826,247, respectively. Cash provided by sale of inventory was $635,620 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to an aggregate of $1,458,361 of cash used for prepayments of inventory and inventory purchases for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Cash provided by accounts receivable was $4,517 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $857,323 in cash used to fund accounts receivable for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Cash provided by accounts payable and accrued expenses was $53,320 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to cash used by accounts payable and accrued expenses of $21,614 for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Amortization of debt discounts totaled $173,249 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $15,669 for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Amortization of beneficial conversion feature of convertible debt totaled $115,973 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Common stock issued for services totaled $433,125 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $366,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Stock-based compensation related to stock options totaled $817,708 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $2,344,286 for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Depreciation and amortization totaled $526,415 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $504,543 for the six months ended June 30, 2015.

Investing Activities

The Company had $0 provided by investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and net cash provided by investing activities totaling $61,539 for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The net cash provided by investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2015 consisted of $89,983 of property and equipment purchases and $151,522 of principal repayments on notes receivable.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 totaled $1,795,520 and $3,273,976, respectively. Cash flows provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2016 consisted of an aggregate of $2,776,430 in borrowing net proceeds from the issuance of notes payable, $250,000 payment of contingent consideration, $612,000 of repayments on convertible notes payable and $118,910 of repayments on note payable to vendor. Cash flows provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2015 consisted of $2,520,000 in proceeds from the sale of common stock and $753,976 in net proceeds from convertible debt.

On January 29, 2016, the Company issued an unsecured promissory note to a lender in the principal amount of $850,000 (“Promissory Note”). The Promissory Note bears interest at 12% per annum, and the Company is obligated to make monthly interest-only payments in the amount of $8,500, commencing March 1, 2016. All principal and accrued and unpaid interest is due under the Promissory Note on February 1, 2018. The Company has the right to prepay the Promissory Note without penalty or premium, provided that if a prepayment of principal is made before July 1, 2016, the investor is entitled to a prepayment interest guarantee equal to six months’ interest. In connection with the Promissory Note, the Company incurred an original issue discount of $30,000 and $18,570 of other debt issuance costs, which will be amortized over the Promissory Note term.

On May 25, 2016 (the “Purchase Price Date”), the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (“Iliad SPA”) with Iliad Research and Trading, L.P. (the “Lender” or “Iliad”) pursuant to which the Lender loaned the Company $2,000,000. On the Purchase Price Date, the Company issued to Lender a Secured Convertible Promissory Note (the “Iliad Note”) in the principal amount of $2,055,000 in exchange for payment by Lender of $2,000,000. The principal sum of the Iliad Note reflects the amount invested, plus a 2.25% “Original Issue Discount” (“OID”) and a $10,000 reimbursement of Lender’s legal fees. Out of the proceeds from the Iliad Note, the Company paid the sum of $25,000 to its placement agent, Myers & Associates, L.P. The Company received net proceeds of $1,975,000 in exchange for the Iliad Note. The Iliad Note requires the repayment of all principal and any interest, fees, charges and late fees on the date that is thirteen months after the Purchase Price Date (the “Maturity Date”). Interest is to be paid on the outstanding balance at a rate of ten percent (10%) per annum from the Purchase Price Date until the Iliad Note is paid in full. Interest is accrued during the term of the Iliad Note and all interest calculations shall be computed on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve (12) thirty (30)-day months and shall compound daily. Subject to adjustment as set forth in the Iliad Note, the conversion price for each Lender conversion shall be $0.50 (the “Lender Conversion Price”), convertible into shares of fully paid and non-assessable common stock. Beginning on the date that is six months after the Purchase Price Date and continuing until the Maturity Date, Iliad shall have the right to redeem a portion of the Iliad Note in any amount up to the Maximum Monthly Redemption Amount ($275,000, which is the maximum aggregate redemption amount that may be redeemed in any calendar month), for which payments may be made in cash or by converting the redemption amount into shares of Company common stock at a conversion price which is the lesser of (a) the Lender Conversion Price of $0.50 and (b) the Market Price, defined as 70% (“the Conversion Factor”), subject to adjustment as follows: if at any time (1) the average of the three lowest closing bid prices in the previous twenty (20) trading days is below $0.25 per share then the Conversion Factor will be reduced by 10%, (2) the Company is not Deposit/Withdrawal At Custodian eligible, then the Conversion Factor will be reduced by an additional 5%, or (3) there has occurred a “Major Default” then the Conversion Factor will be reduced by an additional 5%. The Company may prepay the Iliad Note at any time by payment to Lender of 125% of the principal, interest and other amounts then due under the Note. The Company may prepay the Iliad Note notwithstanding an earlier notice of conversion from the Lender, provided that in such event the Lender may convert an amount not to exceed $300,000 under the Iliad Note. In connection with the Iliad Note, as set forth above, the Company incurred an original issue discount of $45,000 and $35,000 of other debt issuance costs, which will be amortized over the Iliad Note term. The Iliad Note is securitized by the Company’s accounts receivable, inventory and equipment.

The Company has yet to attain a level of operations which allows it to meet operating and working capital cash flow needs. We expect to realize revenue to fund a portion of our working capital needs through the sale of finished products and raw materials to third parties. However, in order to fund our pharmaceutical product development efforts, we will need to raise additional capital through either the issuance of equity and/or debt. We expect to be dependent upon obtaining additional financing in order to adequately fund working capital, infrastructure and expenses in order to execute plans for future operations so that we can achieve a level of revenue adequate to support our cost structure, none of which can be assured.

Liquidity

For the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company had net losses of $2,296,902 and $2,003,068, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company had net losses of $3,760,019 and $4,651,858, respectively. In addition, for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company had negative cash flows from operations of $905,660 and $3,826,247, respectively. Management believes the Company has the funds needed to continue its consumer product business segment and meet its other obligations over the next year solely from current revenues and cash flow due to increased sales and because our current inventory levels are sufficient to support sales through the second quarter of 2017, resulting in reduced cash outflow for inventory purchases. In addition, we do not intend to purchase raw inventory from our supply chain arrangements from the 2016 crop.

The Company’s pharmaceutical business segment will require additional capital of approximately $1,500,000 over the next 12 months. Management believes that it will be able to obtain such financing on terms acceptable to the Company, however, there can be no assurances that the Company will be successful. If the Company is unable to raise additional capital, the Company would likely be forced to curtail pharmaceutical development.

We expect to realize revenue to fund our working capital needs for our consumer product business segment through the sale of raw and finished products to third parties. However, we cannot be assured that our working capital needs to develop, launch, market and sell our products will be met through the sale of raw and finished products to third parties. If not, we may not be able to maintain profitable operations. If we are unable to maintain profitable operations sufficient to fund our business, we would need to raise additional capital through either the issuance of debt or equity. In the event we are unable to maintain profitable operations or raise sufficient additional capital, our ability to continue as a going concern would be in jeopardy and investors could lose all of their investment in the Company.

Numerous other consumer products are currently in development and we will continue to scale up our processing capability to accommodate new products in our pipeline.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has two supply arrangements in place with European farmers to supply raw material in future years. The first arrangement contemplates growth and processing of 2,600 kilograms of product and the second contract provides up to 1 million kilograms of raw product to the Company. At June 30, 2016, there was approximately $150,000 remaining to be paid under this second contract related to the 2015 crop. We have contractual rights for the growth and processing of hemp oil for delivery through October 2018 under both of these contracts. We anticipate the cost under both contracts will remain consistent with current year prices.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable to a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Our management, which is comprised of one person holding the offices of President and Chief Executive Officer and one person holding the offices of Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on such evaluation, our management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective, at a reasonable assurance level, as of the Evaluation Date, to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports that we file or submit under that Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management in a manner that allows timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s procedures and internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2016. In making this assessment, the Company used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework of 1992 (the “1992 COSO Framework”).

Management is aware of and has identified the following material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting: a) the Company has not completed implementation of our procedures and internal control over financial reporting as set forth in the 2013 version of the 1992 COSO Framework; b) the Company did not form an audit committee until the first quarter of 2016; and c) the Company did not have an adequate system and policy of supervisory review and approval of all accounting source documentation, including valuation reports, invoices, payroll reports and other accounting documents during the first quarter of 2016.

Remediation efforts to address these material weaknesses in evaluation and implementation of internal controls over financial reporting, include the following: a) we have dedicated resources to, and anticipate final adoption and implementation of the 2013 version of the 1992 COSO Framework by the end of 2016; and b) on March 16, 2016, the Company adopted an audit committee charter and formed an audit committee and has held audit committee meetings on April 12, 2016, May 12, 2016 and August 3, 2016; c) we have implemented a new system and policy of supervisory review and approval of all accounting source documentation, including valuation reports, invoices, payroll reports and other accounting documents; and d) in addition, the Company has hired a new full-time Controller who will assist in developing and implementing policies and procedures that require proper segregation of duties and internal controls over financial reporting.

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by the Company’s internal controls.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Except as noted above, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified with our evaluation that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2016, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On April 23, 2014, Tanya Sallustro filed a purported class action complaint (the “Complaint”) in the Southern District of New York (the “Court”) alleging securities fraud and related claims against the Company and certain of its officers and directors and seeking compensatory damages including litigation costs. Ms. Sallustro alleges that between March 18-31, 2014, she purchased 325 shares of the Company’s common stock for a total investment of $15,791. The Complaint refers to Current Reports on Form 8-K and Current Reports on Form 8-K/A filings made by the Company on April 3, 2014 and April 14, 2014, in which the Company amended previously disclosed sales (sales originally stated at $1,275,000 were restated to $1,082,375 - reduction of $192,625) and restated goodwill as $1,855,512 (previously reported at net zero). Additionally, the Complaint states after the filing of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on April 3, 2014 and the following press release, the Company’s stock price “fell $7.30 per share, or more than 20%, to close at $25.30 per share.” Subsequent to the filing of the Complaint, six different individuals filed a motion asking to be designated the lead plaintiff in the litigation.  On March 19, 2015, the Court issued a ruling appointing Steve Schuck as lead plaintiff.  Counsel for Mr. Schuck filed a “consolidated amended complaint” on September 14, 2015. On December 11, 2015, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint.  After requesting several extensions, counsel for Mr. Schuck filed an opposition to the motion to dismiss on March 21, 2016.  The Company’s reply brief was filed on April 25, 2016.  No hearing date has been set by the Court at this time.  Management intends to vigorously defend the allegations and an estimate of possible loss cannot be made at this time.

On March 17, 2015, stockholder Michael Ruth filed a shareholder derivative suit in Nevada District Court alleging two causes of action: 1) Breach of Fiduciary Duty, and 2) “Gross Mismanagement.” The claims are premised on the same event as the already-pending securities class action case in New York discussed above – it is alleged that the Form 8-K filings misstated goodwill and sales of the Company, which when corrected, lead to a significant drop in stock price. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the suit on June 29, 2015.  Instead of opposing the Company’s motion, Mr. Ruth filed an amended complaint on July 20, 2015.  Thereafter, Mr. Ruth and the Company agreed to stay the action pending the outcome of the securities class action case in New York discussed above.  Management intends to vigorously defend the allegations.  Since no discovery has been conducted and the case remains stayed, an estimate of the possible loss or recovery cannot be made at this time.

Item 1a. RISK FACTORS

Not applicable to a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K.

Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

Item 3. DEFAULTS UNDER SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

Item 6. EXHIBITS

* Filed herewith.

** The XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability of that section and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing or document.

+ Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment and the non-public information has been filed separately with the Commission.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized,